从这篇LA Times读者来信，看主流媒体对反枪民众的洗脑

1 拥枪携枪权利
1

To the editor: Jackie Calmes discusses AR-15-style weapons. She appears not to know enough about these weapons to make a convincing argument that their ownership, possession and sale by civilians should be illegal.

These guns utilize ammunition consisting of a long, relatively large diameter shell that is designed to hold a large amount of explosive powder, but that has a very narrow neck to hold a long, narrow slug. This slug is therefore blasted out at a very high muzzle velocity of 3,300 feet per second.

The AR-15 is designed to cause a very damaging shock wave that creates an extraordinarily large amount of tissue damage. Because of the projectile’s extraordinarily high velocity and relatively heavy weight, it severely injures or kills virtually any person in its path. It can also easily penetrate walls, furniture and even humans and still injure or kill someone behind.

These characteristics make the AR-15 far too dangerous and destructive for home or business defense. Because of the extraordinary tissue damage created, an AR-15 is wholly unsuitable for hunting. It is a weapon of war suitable only for warfare at least a mile away from any civilians.

David Rudich, Phoenix

1 个赞
2

这位凤凰城的读者，可以说对AR 15 彻底无知，所有他自以为的“知识”不是来自主流媒体洗脑的虚假消息，估计就是道听途说。满篇都是事实错误，却非常地郑郑有词。由此可见主流媒体的洗脑，和许多民众的愚昧。

5 个赞
3

这人不光对AR15一无所知，他更是完全不具备枪支弹药的基本常识。
上面LA Times的文章里的这句话：“ Unlike bullets from typical handguns, the blast effect of an AR-15’s shots fans out within a victim’s body, pulverizes tissue and leaves gaping holes on exiting. In other words, just as the military originally intended, the weapons are all-but-guaranteed killers.”
他所谓的“blast effect”应该就是hollow point，JHP子弹几乎是任何人conceal carry的枪都会携带的他却说unlike…typical handguns。最后那句话更是扯淡，军队普遍用的都是full auto，美国民间常见的AR15却都是semi-auto的。而且所有的枪被设计出来都是为了杀人的，毕竟使用致命武力自卫就是需要让敌人完全丧失行动能力，杀不了人说明枪本身有缺陷。

1 个赞