不用着急，肯定很多人告他们，看这帮龟孙撑不撑得下去
伊州有大概40个sheriff表示他们不会enforce这个规定
是的呀，這幫傢伙就是這麼計畫的，不過不用著急，已經有組織在提告了。ATF並不可以立法，他們的行為本身已經在違憲了。
看有什么变数吧，不知为何脑海里跑出了和为贵一句台词， 输了 龙头棍不交，账本不交， 妈的什么都不交！ 
律师总结：
1 个赞
不支持这种理解方式。回头有机会了解释一下
AR 的Tube 不算，因为是RECYCLE必须的零件
ATF可以给你龟腚tube尾部要改成锥形特别扎手才行
叫你小子贴
，叫你小子抵肩
我非常希望我的理解是錯誤的 
我沒有逐字逐句解讀ATF的文件，這個理解來自
Section V. Final Rule
A. Definition of “Rifle”
Page 269
請看這裡面列出的6點中的第四點列出來buffer tube。當然第五和第六更離譜了
This final rule’s amended definition of “rifle” clarifies that the term “designed, redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder” includes a weapon that is equipped with an accessory, component, or other rearward attachment (e.g., a “stabilizing brace”) that provides surface area that allows the weapon to be fired from the shoulder, provided that other factors, as listed in the rule, indicate that the weapon is designed, made, and intended to be fired from the shoulder. These other factors are:
(i) whether the weapon has a weight or length consistent with the weight or length of similarly designed rifles;
(ii) whether the weapon has a length of pull, measured from the center of the trigger to the center of the shoulder stock or other rearward accessory, component or attachment (including an adjustable or telescoping attachment with the ability to lock into various positions along a buffer tube, receiver extension, or other attachment method) that is consistent with similarly designed rifles;
(iii) whether the weapon is equipped with sights or a scope with eye relief that require the weapon to be fired from the shoulder in order to be used as designed;
(iv) whether the surface area that allows the weapon to be fired from the shoulder is created by a buffer tube, receiver extension, or any other accessory, component, or other rearward attachment that is necessary for the cycle of operations;
(v) the manufacturer’s direct and indirect marketing and promotional materials indicating the intended use of the weapon; and
(vi) information demonstrating the likely use of the weapon in the general community.
按照這個修改，AR平臺就不存在pistol 了
希望我理解是錯誤の，而且ATF不應該有修改這個定義的權力。
我的理解：这些是认定rifle时要考虑的因素, 对于“rear surface" 要看是否 “designed, made, and intended to be fired from the shoulder”
page 160
(5) Final Rule: Necessary for the cycle of operations of the firearm.
The rule provides that ATF may also consider whether the surface area that
allows the weapon to be fired from the shoulder is created by a buffer tube, receiver
extension, component, or other rearward attachment that is necessary for the cycle of
operations (i.e., to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive). This consideration is
drawn from the NPRM and the proposed Worksheet 4999, which assessed two points for
“Extended AR-type Pistol Buffer Tube,” “Inclusion of Folding Adapter extending length
of pull,” and “Use of ‘Spacers’ to extend length of pull.” Id. at 30831. These extensions
provide additional material to the firearm that is not required for the cycle of operations
and, therefore, can be an indicator the firearm is designed, made, and intended to be fired
from the shoulder.
In contrast, material on a firearm that extends the rear surface area of the firearm toward the shooter but is required for the cycle of operations, such as an AR type pistol with a standard 6 to 6-1/2 inch buffer tube, may be an indicator that the firearm is not be designed, made, and intended to be fired from the shoulder.
Even if a weapon is equipped with an accessory, component, or other rearward attachment (e.g., a
“stabilizing brace”) that provides surface area that allows shouldering of the weapon,
under the rule, whether the accessory, component, or other rearward attachment is
necessary for the cycle of operations needs to be considered in determining whether a
firearm is designed, made, and intended to be fired from the shoulder.
1 个赞
謝謝，還真沒仔細看到這段。這樣的話普通的tube就可以解決。剩下的就是支持相關的組織吿死ATF。
啊对 第二天就可以了
这个事我前几天在有些群里说过，如果免费申请被据，结果可能会比较惨。
现在GOA也有人发表类似意见了
原理是这样：正常的SBR Form 1要申请通过以后才能合法组装起来。你如果申请这个免费撸羊毛的SBR，就相当于承认，你已经有非法组装的SBR了，并且还交指纹交照片主动提供犯罪证据。但是你觉得，ATF说了最近提交的Form1不起诉了就没事了吧？且等，那是假设你的Form 1被批准的情况。实际执行中，咱们都知道background check被错误拒绝的可能性有多少。。。如果你的Form 1因为任何原因被拒，那么你手里就是实打实的非法SBR，这时候ATF会怎么做呢？GOA问到的结果，是这时候ATF会对你采取执法行动，那就可以坐很多年牢啦。
所以别以为免费的SBR是赚钱撸羊毛，实际上是自己提着人头往狮子嘴里走，狮子说，嘿，快伸头过来，你如果让我满意，就不真咬你！
4 个赞
好多Facebook枪群里都有人特别高兴说免费注册，下面一堆人劝的…ATF给的免费，要想一想
这个不符合第五修正案吧，任何执法机构不能逼公民自证犯罪。
1 个赞
所以这个规定绝对会被起诉违宪，不过在这之前入套的就只能任AFT鱼肉了
如果申请SBR被拒，最好的出路也只能是立即把枪无偿上缴给ATF了，当然还有可能被起诉坐牢10年。这是注册的风险。
没有逼啊，这是直钩钓鱼，愿者上钩。。。。